Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:tjlincoln wrote:Two penalties for the price of one Does that count as overlapping, since they were not on the same play, but the same play stoppage? Ha...I mean, not according to *your* rules.
Homer wrote:tjlincoln wrote:Two penalties for the price of one Does that count as overlapping, since they were not on the same play, but the same play stoppage?
tjlincoln wrote:Two penalties for the price of one
Two penalties for the price of one
Does that count as overlapping, since they were not on the same play, but the same play stoppage?
Ha...I mean, not according to *your* rules.
lol, we just rarely get one penalty, then a 2nd one on the same team during the delayed call. But yeah I guess it is a fine line at times.
Astounding lack of shots for a 5 on 3.
These are compound penalties.
Grey area
tjlincoln wrote:Both calls looked pretty damn soft to me But I’ll take it
Both calls looked pretty damn soft to me But I’ll take it
But, I’m on the sharks feed and they couldn’t understand what happened and the replay didn’t show much
The amount of 5-on-3 time is kinda irrelevant if it comes in :12 second increments.
Macho man/woman behind bench
OH BABY!!!
Broken twig
Cathy wrote:Tomasino is all over the ****ing place!
Tomasino is all over the ****ing place!
When I saw this, I thought why is Cathy pumping up a sharks player? then I figured it out.
Okay, I pulled up the rewind-able feed to see the Chabot push...that was so hilarious and cute.
Russell wrote:If they can come out of this roadie at .500 with no ullmark, it would be quite acceptable.
If they can come out of this roadie at .500 with no ullmark, it would be quite acceptable.
Agree!!!
Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Russell wrote:data_sprite12 wrote:We're either the too many SNES or delay of game a dumb penalty? I believe too many snes is automatically dumb. I'd call it refs suck before calling it dumb. He was AT the friggin wall, it wasn't a "I can't count with my gloves on" situation. too many SNES isn't automatic dumb penalty. This one was more unfortunate and just made it over the glass in a play along the boards.
Cathy wrote:Russell wrote:data_sprite12 wrote:We're either the too many SNES or delay of game a dumb penalty? I believe too many snes is automatically dumb. I'd call it refs suck before calling it dumb. He was AT the friggin wall, it wasn't a "I can't count with my gloves on" situation.
Russell wrote:data_sprite12 wrote:We're either the too many SNES or delay of game a dumb penalty? I believe too many snes is automatically dumb.
data_sprite12 wrote:We're either the too many SNES or delay of game a dumb penalty?
We're either the too many SNES or delay of game a dumb penalty?
I believe too many snes is automatically dumb.
I'd call it refs suck before calling it dumb. He was AT the friggin wall, it wasn't a "I can't count with my gloves on" situation.
too many SNES isn't automatic dumb penalty. This one was more unfortunate and just made it over the glass in a play along the boards.
FFFFFFFIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNNNNNNEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!
