I can bingo bed with a timeout
Oh, was that 2 in 90?
2 in 90.
Russell wrote:Would we call that a 2 on 1? It only lasted half a second.
Would we call that a 2 on 1? It only lasted half a second.
I don't think we're that desperate for dabs (yet)
Well, that one was. 2 on 1.
Geezus
Why couldn't they have been this good literally ANY OTHER ****ING YEAR?
Russell wrote:Breakaway, other team post.
Breakaway, other team post.
Too much is happening for my level of awakedness
Hands of condra for cozens. Wide freaking open.
Cathy wrote:Sens post
Sens post
2 posts in 90 seconds
Sens post.
make that 2.
No more moorings under net
Dumb/ cousins penalty.
Timmy earning that A+ from Noodles
Russell wrote:Russell wrote:If the Sens come home from this trip with .500, with no Chuckie or chabot, that would be a very successful trip. IMO. I mean, no Chuckie or chabot playing, not like they leave them out west.
Russell wrote:If the Sens come home from this trip with .500, with no Chuckie or chabot, that would be a very successful trip. IMO.
If the Sens come home from this trip with .500, with no Chuckie or chabot, that would be a very successful trip. IMO.
I mean, no Chuckie or chabot playing, not like they leave them out west.
Russell wrote:Sens score first, one hammer, screen goal.
Sens score first, one hammer, screen goal.
Quad dab and I only recognized one…I am definitely off my game tonight.
