Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Net tried to de-moor itself, gravity won. Fun fact. Before switching to the Marsh Pegs in 1991, the NHL used to use magnets to hold the nets in place.The reason for the change is that no one knew how magnets worked.
Cathy wrote:Net tried to de-moor itself, gravity won.
Net tried to de-moor itself, gravity won.
Fun fact. Before switching to the Marsh Pegs in 1991, the NHL used to use magnets to hold the nets in place.
The reason for the change is that no one knew how magnets worked.
ONLY HE KNEW!!!
What the hell were the Sens doing there?
I remember when Gordie Howes son got impaled on one of the old solid pegs. Ugly.
Hope Sanderson didn't pull a Bobby Ryan hand injury.
Russell wrote:Oh yeah, Pinto signs! woot! great deal. But, that next one is going to be a doozey.
Oh yeah, Pinto signs! woot! great deal. But, that next one is going to be a doozey.
You missed an incredible opportunity...
Pinto signs! toot!
Russell wrote:Cathy wrote:Cathy wrote:minuet Sens PP and MASSIVE lubeI could get graphic but I'll save that for Russell SPLOOSH!
Cathy wrote:Cathy wrote:minuet Sens PP and MASSIVE lubeI could get graphic but I'll save that for Russell
Cathy wrote:minuet Sens PP
minuet Sens PP
and MASSIVE lube
I could get graphic but I'll save that for Russell
SPLOOSH!
There was definitely drippage.
no more D injuries!
Cathy wrote:AYKM G-spot
AYKM G-spot
aren't they all?
Cathy wrote:Only because it hilariously fits with tonight's theme...I have a terrible headache.
Only because it hilariously fits with tonight's theme...
I have a terrible headache.
twsas
Good start but can they continue for 2 more periods? They haven't played a full 3 period game in a while.
New guy assist
Shot type TBD per NHL but he did the knee thing!
One timer minuet goal by Cozens.
minuet goal to bookend the period
Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:The eternal question of this game…would the G-spot have been found without the lube?? Follow up question. If G finds the spot on a 2-on-1, does that make it a threesome? Are we dabbing 2-on-1 or are we just hypothesizing?
Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:The eternal question of this game…would the G-spot have been found without the lube?? Follow up question. If G finds the spot on a 2-on-1, does that make it a threesome?
Cathy wrote:The eternal question of this game…would the G-spot have been found without the lube??
The eternal question of this game…would the G-spot have been found without the lube??
Follow up question.
If G finds the spot on a 2-on-1, does that make it a threesome?
Are we dabbing 2-on-1 or are we just hypothesizing?
Hypothesizing.
