Russell wrote:Cathy wrote:Russell wrote:GCathy wrote:I have a headache. Twsas Took you long enough. Twssplus, I’m in a battle with an enormous pork chop.
Cathy wrote:Russell wrote:GCathy wrote:I have a headache. Twsas Took you long enough.
Russell wrote:GCathy wrote:I have a headache. Twsas
GCathy wrote:I have a headache.
I have a headache.
Twsas
Took you long enough.
Twss
plus, I’m in a battle with an enormous pork chop.
I had pork chops for dinner too!
Cathy wrote:"Mika Zibanejad, hair askew, …"
"Mika Zibanejad, hair askew, …"
ZBad's hair got a point against former team.
Homer wrote:Russell wrote:Was there an AYKM by korps? Looked like it on the hilites. I don't remember it. Might have been getting something to drink.
Russell wrote:Was there an AYKM by korps? Looked like it on the hilites.
Was there an AYKM by korps? Looked like it on the hilites.
I don't remember it. Might have been getting something to drink.
I feel like there's definitely a cumulative AYKM save against Laffy at this point.
SH deviated goal for the Rangers.
Russell wrote:Evening, Sam. oh, gotta go eat. I’ll be back.
Evening, Sam.
oh, gotta go eat. I’ll be back.
Again! Fat Bastard!
Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:2-on-0.14 Sens don't score 1st. Was that enough to dab breakaway? I was thinking more 2-on-1. lol
Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:2-on-0.14 Sens don't score 1st. Was that enough to dab breakaway?
Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:2-on-0.14 Sens don't score 1st.
Cathy wrote:2-on-0.14
2-on-0.14
Sens don't score 1st.
Was that enough to dab breakaway?
I was thinking more 2-on-1. lol
Rangers pull their goalie with 2.4 secs left in the 1st, while on the PP and a face off in the Sens zone.
Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:2-on-0.14 Sens don't score 1st. Was that enough to dab breakaway? I was thinking more 2-on-1. lol I have then on the same row, I'm flexible. Same. Sanderson was maybe 1/2 a step behind and did force them to play it as a 2-on-1.
Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:2-on-0.14 Sens don't score 1st. Was that enough to dab breakaway? I was thinking more 2-on-1. lol I have then on the same row, I'm flexible.
I have then on the same row, I'm flexible.
Same.
Sanderson was maybe 1/2 a step behind and did force them to play it as a 2-on-1.
Okay, I'll accept that logic.
Sens 1st on PK.
I know *why* they're saying it but I'm not sure using present tense to describe Norris — "Norris *is* an integral part down the center" — is the proper line of thinking.
That shot caught him on the dangler. That sounds like it could hurt.
