Cathy wrote:

---

I have no Stutzle, I have no SH

My card sucks

---

 I have both... In the same line!

Russell wrote:

---

Sens first on pk

---

 I was just thinking…we must have missed the first penalty, right? lol

senior wrote:

---

That actually  was a pretty good period for the Sens. Outshot the lafs 19 - 9.

---

 I just noticed the shot count but was afraid to comment out loud.

senior wrote:

---

Cathy wrote:

---

Homer wrote:

---

Cathy wrote:

---

I was actually thinking it'd be funny to set some squares up as possible duplicates. So you could have two London Bobbies or two New Guys.

---

 Just not two "Sens score 1st" right?

---

 I'm pretty sure we can remove that one altogether but, yes, some squares would obviously be single-use only.

---

 We could have a special duplicate square. But you can only dab it if you already have dabbed a square aka london bobby. 

---

 "London Bobby" and "The London Bobby returns" ?

senior wrote:

---

Cathy wrote:

---

Homer wrote:

---

Cathy wrote:

---

I was actually thinking it'd be funny to set some squares up as possible duplicates. So you could have two London Bobbies or two New Guys.

---

 Just not two "Sens score 1st" right?

---

 I'm pretty sure we can remove that one altogether but, yes, some squares would obviously be single-use only.

---

 We could have a special duplicate square. But you can only dab it if you already have dabbed a square aka london bobby. 

---

 Oooh, like literally "Duplicate"? I like that better!

Cathy wrote:

---

Homer wrote:

---

Cathy wrote:

---

I was actually thinking it'd be funny to set some squares up as possible duplicates. So you could have two London Bobbies or two New Guys.

---

 Just not two "Sens score 1st" right?

---

 I'm pretty sure we can remove that one altogether but, yes, some squares would obviously be single-use only.

---

 We could have a special duplicate square. But you can only dab it if you already have dabbed a square aka london bobby. 

Homer wrote:

---

Cathy wrote:

---

I was actually thinking it'd be funny to set some squares up as possible duplicates. So you could have two London Bobbies or two New Guys.

---

 Just not two "Sens score 1st" right?

---

 I'm pretty sure we can remove that one altogether but, yes, some squares would obviously be single-use only.

Chabot 6:39 ice time in 1st.

senior wrote:

---

I think that because the refs were soooooooooo bad last game, the refs suck square should be an automatic dab for the next 2 or 3 games.

---

 {checks card}

I can support that.