Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Excuse me, I need a moment...If tj here here, he wouldn't like this. If Russell was here, he'd say twss.
Cathy wrote:Excuse me, I need a moment...
Excuse me, I need a moment...
If tj here here, he wouldn't like this.
If Russell was here, he'd say twss.
Lol, you're multitasking for them?
Homer wrote:Homer wrote:OMG!This is unreal.My card is going the same way this game is.
Homer wrote:OMG!This is unreal.
OMG!
This is unreal.
My card is going the same way this game is.
Lol, no chance in hell you're dabbing "2nd post"
Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:I think that counts as player in net but not puck Did we count goalies on that one? I forget.
Cathy wrote:I think that counts as player in net but not puck
I think that counts as player in net but not puck
Did we count goalies on that one? I forget.
It also helps my 4-corner bingo, so just go with it, eh?
Homer wrote:That looks like a good goal to me.
That looks like a good goal to me.
Good goal, 2 USA players get their 3rd point.
Finally, somebody has 3 points
Not usually, but I think this was a bit different since the puck was on net and the goalie kept it out while he was in the net.
timeout USA
And that's a bingo!
Timeout USA
Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:IIHF is stingy with secondary assists. McGroaty joins the 3 point watch. That 6 USA players and 2 Swedes.
Cathy wrote:IIHF is stingy with secondary assists.
IIHF is stingy with secondary assists.
McGroaty joins the 3 point watch. That 6 USA players and 2 Swedes.
That only 2 Swedes are on watch is cra-zy.
Watch the go ahead goal gets scored in final minute and gets disallowed.
"USA hits post"
Thankfully I don't need this square for bingo.