Cathy wrote:Pfft, *I* think they should challengeBut, honestly, what's the point at 5-1 vs 5-0?
Pfft, *I* think they should challenge
But, honestly, what's the point at 5-1 vs 5-0?
The point is that it's worth a dab.
Play is under review.
Ducks hit the post.
Ducks ding dong the post
Cannot WAIT for Movember to be over, I do not like the 70s serial killer look.
Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Well that was just dumb luck Reverse AYKM?
Cathy wrote:Well that was just dumb luck
Well that was just dumb luck
Reverse AYKM?
That's the sarcastic one? Yep.
Homer wrote:Was that enough for a 2-on-1?
Was that enough for a 2-on-1?
I am probably too biased to answer that question.
senior wrote:Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:SensKat wrote:Homer wrote:SensKat wrote:That Zub goal is still listed as his, but watching the replay it looks like it deflected off Motte's stick, and then went crossbar and in Was it crossbar or top-back bar? The replay is a bit hard to be sure. Looked like it might be crossbarLooks like back bar. If it was crossbar, it would have deviated downwards. https://twitter.com/Senators/status/1596263021067657216?s=20&t=oSKnxCpuXG1zWW1JS2uHfg Get outta here with your logic and laws of physics! Doesn't look like it touched the cross bar to me.
Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:SensKat wrote:Homer wrote:SensKat wrote:That Zub goal is still listed as his, but watching the replay it looks like it deflected off Motte's stick, and then went crossbar and in Was it crossbar or top-back bar? The replay is a bit hard to be sure. Looked like it might be crossbarLooks like back bar. If it was crossbar, it would have deviated downwards. https://twitter.com/Senators/status/1596263021067657216?s=20&t=oSKnxCpuXG1zWW1JS2uHfg Get outta here with your logic and laws of physics!
Homer wrote:SensKat wrote:Homer wrote:SensKat wrote:That Zub goal is still listed as his, but watching the replay it looks like it deflected off Motte's stick, and then went crossbar and in Was it crossbar or top-back bar? The replay is a bit hard to be sure. Looked like it might be crossbarLooks like back bar. If it was crossbar, it would have deviated downwards. https://twitter.com/Senators/status/1596263021067657216?s=20&t=oSKnxCpuXG1zWW1JS2uHfg
SensKat wrote:Homer wrote:SensKat wrote:That Zub goal is still listed as his, but watching the replay it looks like it deflected off Motte's stick, and then went crossbar and in Was it crossbar or top-back bar? The replay is a bit hard to be sure. Looked like it might be crossbar
Homer wrote:SensKat wrote:That Zub goal is still listed as his, but watching the replay it looks like it deflected off Motte's stick, and then went crossbar and in Was it crossbar or top-back bar?
SensKat wrote:That Zub goal is still listed as his, but watching the replay it looks like it deflected off Motte's stick, and then went crossbar and in
That Zub goal is still listed as his, but watching the replay it looks like it deflected off Motte's stick, and then went crossbar and in
Was it crossbar or top-back bar?
The replay is a bit hard to be sure. Looked like it might be crossbar
Looks like back bar. If it was crossbar, it would have deviated downwards.
https://twitter.com/Senators/status/1596263021067657216?s=20&t=oSKnxCpuXG1zWW1JS2uHfg
Get outta here with your logic and laws of physics!
Doesn't look like it touched the cross bar to me.
Yeah, that's a different angle replay
I have to get going now. Enjoy the rest of the game!
Homer wrote:senior wrote:Russell wrote:might be a deviation on that. For sure. I think they will change that one. So its' either a deviation or a Sens d-man scores.
senior wrote:Russell wrote:might be a deviation on that. For sure. I think they will change that one.
Russell wrote:might be a deviation on that.
might be a deviation on that.
For sure. I think they will change that one.
So its' either a deviation or a Sens d-man scores.
They still have it as Zub's goal, so it's a Sens d-man scores, not a deviation dab. (unless it gets changed later)