don't suppose anyone lost a lid in this game?
https://www.focusring.ca/bingo/SensBingo.html?board=GQZsSOeirAIpRthlnXNEYJom&scored=7197728&tscored=111112200102112&bname=Russell?
my card.
Cathy wrote:For crying out loud, just end it!
For crying out loud, just end it!
twss
tjlincoln wrote:Quacks 3-2 Terry winner
Quacks 3-2 Terry winner
Wrong 😑
No cigar today: https://www.focusring.ca/bingo/SensBingo.html?board=WNfXnOdACBYRFhLGakpIZMjS&scored=13245016&tscored=221001020122102&bname=senior
One cigar on my card. If we count the 2-on-1 break, it's two cigars.
my final too many almost-bingos card
senior wrote:Never any doubt.
Never any doubt.
Well maybe some...
I hate hockey
I hate bingo
final OTT card
final ANA card
Silfverberg getting sassy?!
Cathy wrote:The digital ads are a real mind-f*ck when you watch the opposition feed of an arena you know very well.
The digital ads are a real mind-f*ck when you watch the opposition feed of an arena you know very well.
lol, Why is Bell and Canadian Tire advertising in Anaheim.
Homer wrote:Ducks should pull the goalie and Sens score a SH here, just saying...
Ducks should pull the goalie and Sens score a SH here, just saying...
That would be an EN as well? I'm in!
refs suck
Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Pfft, *I* think they should challengeBut, honestly, what's the point at 5-1 vs 5-0? The point is that it's worth a dab. Play is under review.
Cathy wrote:Pfft, *I* think they should challengeBut, honestly, what's the point at 5-1 vs 5-0?
Pfft, *I* think they should challenge
But, honestly, what's the point at 5-1 vs 5-0?
The point is that it's worth a dab.
Play is under review.
the goal stands.
Cathy wrote:I've already dabbed the disallowed square
I've already dabbed the disallowed square
Really?
