Okay, who's bailing?
tjlincoln wrote:Russell wrote:tjlincoln wrote:Russell wrote:Matt Benning on 3 point watch. I don’t know the score yet and I’m guessing that guy doesn’t play for the Sens EK65 now also on 3 point watch, or more. Just found the box score and it’s not pretty but EK65 now has 30 points in 21 games, I do believe that is good for a Dman
Russell wrote:tjlincoln wrote:Russell wrote:Matt Benning on 3 point watch. I don’t know the score yet and I’m guessing that guy doesn’t play for the Sens EK65 now also on 3 point watch, or more.
tjlincoln wrote:Russell wrote:Matt Benning on 3 point watch. I don’t know the score yet and I’m guessing that guy doesn’t play for the Sens
Russell wrote:Matt Benning on 3 point watch.
Matt Benning on 3 point watch.
I don’t know the score yet and I’m guessing that guy doesn’t play for the Sens
EK65 now also on 3 point watch, or more.
Just found the box score and it’s not pretty but EK65 now has 30 points in 21 games, I do believe that is good for a Dman
They were talking about his points pace during intermission...115-point season I think it was.
freaking shooting gallery. Forsberg must have PTSD after that.
Russell wrote:they weren't supposed to have trouble finding the back of the net. I was told this.
they weren't supposed to have trouble finding the back of the net. I was told this.
Hey, I found some wifi!! This is the first thing I read and I agree. We were lied to, again. Thx Cathy!!!
deviation
sheesh
dumb penalty for hamonic.
Cathy wrote:Kardinal wrote:I’d say that was a screened goal. Not quite goalie interference. Friendly fire interference
Kardinal wrote:I’d say that was a screened goal. Not quite goalie interference.
I’d say that was a screened goal. Not quite goalie interference.
Friendly fire interference
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pygIuosClxI
second goal wasn't good but not much he could do there. he got spun around.
senior wrote:Screened?
Screened?
I would say yes.
goalie pulled
sigh
