Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Sens Callups → Sens Callups → senscallups → Jets @ Habs - Game 4 - Mon Jun 7, 8:00pm
 

Topic: Jets @ Habs - Game 4 - Mon Jun 7, 8:00pm

Post Info
SensKat
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
RE: Jets @ Habs - Game 4 - Mon Jun 7, 8:00pm
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:

When you get nothing on a multi-dab play, it's quite discouraging for the evening's prospects.

 Still waiting for the SH, Deviated, EN, Off the post goal, in final minute of a period, by a D-man, gets reviewed and counts scenario. 

 Oh and also a 3rd point for someone on that goal. 

 That was both Amazing, and someone trips and hilariously ends up in the net
Homer
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 20327
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:

When you get nothing on a multi-dab play, it's quite discouraging for the evening's prospects.

 Still waiting for the SH, Deviated, EN, Off the post goal, in final minute of a period, by a D-man, gets reviewed and counts scenario. 

 Oh and also a 3rd point for someone on that goal. 
Homer
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 20327
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:

When you get nothing on a multi-dab play, it's quite discouraging for the evening's prospects.

 Still waiting for the SH, Deviated, EN, Off the post goal, in final minute of a period, by a D-man, gets reviewed and counts scenario. 
Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 
SensKat wrote:
Cathy wrote:
SensKat wrote:

sounded like a post and in?

 NHLN commentary said yes.

(triggered SensKat patience delay)

 haha.  Annoying, isn't it?

 Yes, it is. I usually just wait but I figured, why not provide commentary?



Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lol, it took NHLN a good 15 seconds to get the PP up on the board. I was like, wait, I saw a guy in the box, I know I did.
Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 
SensKat wrote:

Defenseman goal

 So that's a 4-dab goal and I have n-o-t-h-i-n-g!
Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 

The forum software just can't handle the speed at which Cat/Kat brains operate. Sad.
SensKat
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:
SensKat wrote:

sounded like a post and in?

 NHLN commentary said yes.

(triggered SensKat patience delay)

 haha.  Annoying, isn't it?
SensKat
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
Defenseman goal

Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 
SensKat wrote:

sounded like a post and in?

 NHLN commentary said yes.

(triggered SensKat patience delay)
Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 

When you get nothing on a multi-dab play, it's quite discouraging for the evening's prospects.
SensKat
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
sounded like a post and in?

Homer
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 20327
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:

Does a goalie negating an icing because player was going to beat the icing count as beat the icing?

I stepped away for a sec...skater was on track to beat the icing already so goalie said, "What the hell, might as well play the puck?" I think in that case, yes.

I first read your post as goalie played puck without pressure and negated the icing. Which I don't think would be the spirit of the square but could definitely be a brain fart if we still had it.

 It was the former.  FTR, I don't have that square.  Saw the play develop and it sparked a thought... then there was smoke. 
Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:

Home team get first PP

 And score, post and in
SensKat
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
home team scores 1st, on the PP

SensKat
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 

Home team first PP



-- Edited by SensKat on Monday 7th of June 2021 08:23:55 PM

Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 

Home team get first PP
Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 
SensKat wrote:
Homer wrote:

Does a goalie negating an icing because player was going to beat the icing count as beat the icing?

 geez..... I would have to rule no, I guess....

Kat and Cat on opposite sides, the world just might be ending.

(There's been a cluster of earthquakes at the CA/Mexico boarder so, yeah, maybe!)
Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:

Does a goalie negating an icing because player was going to beat the icing count as beat the icing?

I stepped away for a sec...skater was on track to beat the icing already so goalie said, "What the hell, might as well play the puck?" I think in that case, yes.

I first read your post as goalie played puck without pressure and negated the icing. Which I don't think would be the spirit of the square but could definitely be a brain fart if we still had it.
SensKat
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:

Does a goalie negating an icing because player was going to beat the icing count as beat the icing?

 geez..... I would have to rule no, I guess....
 
«First  <  1 … 5 6 7 8  >  Last»  | Page of 8  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.