Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Sens Callups → Sens Callups → senscallups → Game 47 - Sens @ Canucks - Thu Apr 22, 10:00pm
 

Topic: Game 47 - Sens @ Canucks - Thu Apr 22, 10:00pm

Post Info
Russell
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 22445
Date:
RE: Game 47 - Sens @ Canucks - Thu Apr 22, 10:00pm
Permalink  
 

REFS SUCK! OBVIOUS TRIP!
SensKat
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:

What's the geopolitical temperature re: Beijing '22? Boycott in the realm of possibility?

 I don't think we'll see boycotts, but I can see participation, and certainly attendance being much lower
Russell
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 22445
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:

What's the geopolitical temperature re: Beijing '22? Boycott in the realm of possibility?

it really seems......wrong, somehow, that China should be able to host the olympics when its now pretty clear their attempts to cover up the early days of the virus caused a global catastrophe. shouldn't they have to be accountable, somehow? 
Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 
Russell wrote:

Chabot should NOT go to the worlds. he's played way too much already and its not worth the covid risk. 

Worlds seems insane on multiple levels. For anyone. Everyone.

Making in through a highly time-compressed schedule without injury to roll the dice with a highly time-compressed international tourney whose anew doesn't start with "O-lim" and end with "pics"? 

Yeah, no.
SensKat
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
Russell wrote:

Chabot should NOT go to the worlds. he's played way too much already and its not worth the covid risk. 

 I would tend to agree.  Plus I'm fairly sure he's playing injured.  Take the time off.
Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 

What's the geopolitical temperature re: Beijing '22? Boycott in the realm of possibility?
Russell
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 22445
Date:
Permalink  
 

Chabot should NOT go to the worlds. he's played way too much already and its not worth the covid risk. 
Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 
SensKat wrote:
Cathy wrote:

Who are these guys in white decisively entering the offensive zone??

 Same guys that just tripped on the trapezoid

Gotta keep the fans humble. 
Russell
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 22445
Date:
Permalink  
 

player starts interview answer with "yeah, no." Dab.
Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 

OTT

10-1-1 when leading after two periods

 

VAN

3-16-2 when trailing after two periods

 
senior
Pie Connoisseur
Status: Offline
Posts: 9089
Date:
Permalink  
 
SensKat wrote:
senior wrote:
SensKat wrote:
senior wrote:
Russell wrote:
senior wrote:

Did the Canucks hit a post? And is Stuetzle goal considered a slump breaker?

 you just woke up on the couch, didn't you?

 Actually was watching a movie and forgot about the game.

 Do you need a card check?

 Sure if you don't mind. Think I got most of them.

 This is what I have for you:

 

http://www.focusring.ca/bingo/SensBingo.html?board=qVmYjTIUrnRLdeAkWBoQGDsJ&scored=800320&bname=senior

 

 Thanks.
SensKat
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 

Outshot in the 2nd
SensKat
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:

Who are these guys in white decisively entering the offensive zone??

 Same guys that just tripped on the trapezoid
Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 

Who are these guys in white decisively entering the offensive zone??
SensKat
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
Considering the number of dabs in the first.... the second has been awfully dead

SensKat
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
senior wrote:
SensKat wrote:
senior wrote:
Russell wrote:
senior wrote:

Did the Canucks hit a post? And is Stuetzle goal considered a slump breaker?

 you just woke up on the couch, didn't you?

 Actually was watching a movie and forgot about the game.

 Do you need a card check?

 Sure if you don't mind. Think I got most of them.

 This is what I have for you:

 

http://www.focusring.ca/bingo/SensBingo.html?board=qVmYjTIUrnRLdeAkWBoQGDsJ&scored=800320&bname=senior

 
Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 
Russell wrote:
Cathy wrote:
SensKat wrote:

Nice to see Murray making solid saves.

 It's that lovely paradox, happy to see goalie making good saves...but you wish he wasn't in the position that he needed to.

 not to mention, maybe we need to lose most of these final games. we're crawling out of the the bottom 5. 

 It wouldn't be a true tank season if there wasn't a last-minute, yet ultimately useless, points grab late in the season.



senior
Pie Connoisseur
Status: Offline
Posts: 9089
Date:
Permalink  
 
SensKat wrote:
senior wrote:
Russell wrote:
senior wrote:

Did the Canucks hit a post? And is Stuetzle goal considered a slump breaker?

 you just woke up on the couch, didn't you?

 Actually was watching a movie and forgot about the game.

 Do you need a card check?

 Sure if you don't mind. Think I got most of them.
SensKat
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
ok, someone definitely turned off the Kat filter. Be warned.... I can post even more now.

SensKat
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
senior wrote:
Russell wrote:
senior wrote:

Did the Canucks hit a post? And is Stuetzle goal considered a slump breaker?

 you just woke up on the couch, didn't you?

 Actually was watching a movie and forgot about the game.

 Do you need a card check?
 
«First  <  1 2 3 4 5 6 … 11  >  Last»  | Page of 11  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.