Russell wrote:Kardinal wrote:Cathy wrote:With a back-to-back game, I figured the Chabot 9:20 square would be a dead dab. 9:48, 9:51, 9:56. How is that boy still standing? Channelling his inner EK65. Speaking of, did you folks hear EK65's comments the other day?
Kardinal wrote:Cathy wrote:With a back-to-back game, I figured the Chabot 9:20 square would be a dead dab. 9:48, 9:51, 9:56. How is that boy still standing? Channelling his inner EK65.
Cathy wrote:With a back-to-back game, I figured the Chabot 9:20 square would be a dead dab. 9:48, 9:51, 9:56. How is that boy still standing?
With a back-to-back game, I figured the Chabot 9:20 square would be a dead dab. 9:48, 9:51, 9:56. How is that boy still standing?
Channelling his inner EK65.
Speaking of, did you folks hear EK65's comments the other day?
No lies detected either 🤣
http://www.focusring.ca/bingo/SensBingo.html?board=GNpWBiJgqOZnPXsRVYhtlAoC&scored=4445696&bname=Russell
final card.
My final card. Close, but no bingo
So close. My final card: http://www.focusring.ca/bingo/SensBingo.html?board=XYkqVKjacDZeFIUhNsEBdAfg&scored=18929219&bname=senior
Shots 17-11 Sens in the 3rd.
they played very well, though. demko was nuts.
And 3 posts.
SensKat wrote:Whoops Chuckie.
Whoops Chuckie.
That was suboptimal too
My final card
that's what happens when you play him all game. his brain shuts off in OT.
SensKat wrote:And the Nucks win it.
And the Nucks win it.
and no one picked JT miller.
But I have a correct score and a dab for that.
Bad change by the SNES as it was two forwards on the ice and Chabot went to change leaving Chuckie to try and defend. Oops. Too many minutes for Chabot causes brain farts.
Argh, that sucks.
But not completely...bingo card.
breakaway.
bah!
Homer wrote:So I need lube or someone in thread to get the GWG and two people in this thread picked injured players.
So I need lube or someone in thread to get the GWG and two people in this thread picked injured players.
Chaffing?
