Only 13,000 again tonight. Not good.
Russell wrote:Russell wrote:i do have some doubts about this game but I'll stick with the boys. 3-1 sens. Hoffman winner. and he just keeps racking up the pool points!
Russell wrote:i do have some doubts about this game but I'll stick with the boys. 3-1 sens. Hoffman winner.
i do have some doubts about this game but I'll stick with the boys.
3-1 sens. Hoffman winner.
and he just keeps racking up the pool points!
Alright Hoffman with winner. That's who I picked. Before I changed it.
Russell wrote:Homer wrote:SensKat wrote:argh, get it out!! TWSS LMAO!!! BEST ONE YET!!!!
Homer wrote:SensKat wrote:argh, get it out!! TWSS
SensKat wrote:argh, get it out!!
argh, get it out!!
TWSS
LMAO!!! BEST ONE YET!!!!
LIKE!!!!!!!
SensKat wrote:PHEW!!
PHEW!!
Homer wrote:SensKat wrote:Ouch not sure that's what he said
SensKat wrote:Ouch
Ouch
not sure that's what he said
can't quote him on here, there's filters
senior wrote:Russell wrote:Homer wrote:Russell wrote:I wonder if Bob Cole would screw up Condon's name by calling him Prophylactic? would he have a .980 save percentage? That's one goalie you'd want to be perfect. Yep. No one likes a leaky Condon.
Russell wrote:Homer wrote:Russell wrote:I wonder if Bob Cole would screw up Condon's name by calling him Prophylactic? would he have a .980 save percentage? That's one goalie you'd want to be perfect.
Homer wrote:Russell wrote:I wonder if Bob Cole would screw up Condon's name by calling him Prophylactic? would he have a .980 save percentage?
Russell wrote:I wonder if Bob Cole would screw up Condon's name by calling him Prophylactic?
I wonder if Bob Cole would screw up Condon's name by calling him Prophylactic?
would he have a .980 save percentage?
That's one goalie you'd want to be perfect.
Yep. No one likes a leaky Condon.
BA-BUM-TSSSS!!!!
It must be illegal to be showing Christmas movies already.
BAHAHAHA!
lazy shift by turris there. 2 turn overs.
