Kardinal wrote:If Cowen has 4 points in five games, and Smith is playing better as a C than a winger, should Lazar be scratched every night? I'll hang up and listen to your answer.
If Cowen has 4 points in five games, and Smith is playing better as a C than a winger, should Lazar be scratched every night?
I'll hang up and listen to your answer.
of course they could just cut Greening and problem solved
NO!!!
tjlincoln wrote:my Gawd!!! the officials got that call right
my Gawd!!! the officials got that call right
I was afraid that Turris was going to get the only penalty.
Russell wrote:Turris! never go full condra!
Turris! never go full condra!
too late, at least in this game
Homer wrote: Could be worse....
Well played sir. I do say that on a semi-regular basis, but I really do mean it....most of the time.
Now: is a Cowen goal like a Phillips goal, in terms of expected results? Defensive left shot blueliner, and all.
Homer wrote:Kardinal wrote:Well, this is a fine turn of events. Who do these Senators think they are, scoring in the 2nd period? Now I'll have to re-write the game summary I already had ready, based on their play out west. Could be worse....
Kardinal wrote:Well, this is a fine turn of events. Who do these Senators think they are, scoring in the 2nd period? Now I'll have to re-write the game summary I already had ready, based on their play out west.
Well, this is a fine turn of events. Who do these Senators think they are, scoring in the 2nd period?
Now I'll have to re-write the game summary I already had ready, based on their play out west.
Could be worse....
ha!
canuck wrote:TJ I noticed the ref pointing too. Funny
TJ I noticed the ref pointing too. Funny
I thought for sure he was going to call incidental contact and call off the goal
LOL!! leave it to Homer to remember
Russell wrote:offside? i think so. oh well!!
offside? i think so.
oh well!!
exactly
I've always liked that Cowen
