Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
 

Topic: Bingo planning

Post Info
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 28185
Date:
RE: Bingo planning
Permalink  
 

how about a "how swede it is" square for a swede point?



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 28185
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:

So...having a conversation about how to improve my scoring script and when Claude asked for clarification if Pinto/Stutzle/G-spot were just goals or assists as well...I may have stumbled upon a G-spot rephrase

 

"Goal only for Pinto, Stutzle, Giroux (g-spot subject to expansion)"


 so legend has it. 



Stupid Canadian Wolf Bird
Status: Offline
Posts: 19798
Date:
Permalink  
 

So...having a conversation about how to improve my scoring script and when Claude asked for clarification if Pinto/Stutzle/G-spot were just goals or assists as well...I may have stumbled upon a G-spot rephrase

 

"Goal only for Pinto, Stutzle, Giroux (g-spot subject to expansion)"



Stupid Canadian Wolf Bird
Status: Offline
Posts: 19798
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:

I replaced the Chuckie square with "Equipment malfunction" (lost skate blade, broken glass and others except for broken twig and lost lid)

There was talk of maing the G spot easier to find. How can it be worded without losing it's "double meaning"?

Was there any other tweaks?


 I think Chuckie turned out to be the only dead one. And again I'd like to nominate "Tkachuckle ****" as FLA-specific center square.

 

G-spot celly

G-spot group hug

 

Suggested by Gemini after I prompted with "something in the vein of 'g-spot celebration'"; would be applicable to any Giroux point.

Also offered by Gemini: "G slides it through the tiny gap", "G gets stuck in the dirty areas", "G hits the sweet spot", "G sets up the spot". Good for a laugh if nothing else. 

 

Celebration at the G-spot

Group Hug the G-spot

 

Those would be sleep-deprived Cathy variations on the Gemini variations.



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 28185
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:

I replaced the Chuckie square with "Equipment malfunction" (lost skate blade, broken glass and others except for broken twig and lost lid)

There was talk of maing the G spot easier to find. How can it be worded without losing it's "double meaning"?

Better get  AI on this. No mortal man has ever figured it out.



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 23242
Date:
Permalink  
 

I replaced the Chuckie square with "Equipment malfunction" (lost skate blade, broken glass and others except for broken twig and lost lid)

There was talk of maing the G spot easier to find. How can it be worded without losing it's "double meaning"?

Was there any other tweaks?



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 28185
Date:
Permalink  
 
senior wrote:
Cathy wrote:
data_sprite12 wrote:

Honest question: do we think Giroux will score enough to retain his square?  Why didn't we ever give Batherson one in the first place?


 G helps someone else find the spot?

 

I also agree that it will  likely be a dab-light square. But I feel like after the "he's leaving to retire in PHI, wait no he's not!" it would be rude to take his square away.


 How about a G does something square. Goal, assist, penalty.


 G makes the effort.



Pie Connoisseur
Status: Offline
Posts: 9913
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:
data_sprite12 wrote:

Honest question: do we think Giroux will score enough to retain his square?  Why didn't we ever give Batherson one in the first place?


 G helps someone else find the spot?

 

I also agree that it will  likely be a dab-light square. But I feel like after the "he's leaving to retire in PHI, wait no he's not!" it would be rude to take his square away.


 How about a G does something square. Goal, assist, penalty.



Stupid Canadian Wolf Bird
Status: Offline
Posts: 19798
Date:
Permalink  
 
data_sprite12 wrote:

Honest question: do we think Giroux will score enough to retain his square?  Why didn't we ever give Batherson one in the first place?


 G helps someone else find the spot?

 

I also agree that it will  likely be a dab-light square. But I feel like after the "he's leaving to retire in PHI, wait no he's not!" it would be rude to take his square away.



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 28185
Date:
Permalink  
 
senior wrote:
Russell wrote:
data_sprite12 wrote:

Honest question: do we think Giroux will score enough to retain his square?  Why didn't we ever give Batherson one in the first place?


 B finds the spot?


 I agree. Don't think G will score enough goals to warrant a square.

How about B bangs it home.


 B buries it?



Pie Connoisseur
Status: Offline
Posts: 9913
Date:
Permalink  
 
Russell wrote:
data_sprite12 wrote:

Honest question: do we think Giroux will score enough to retain his square?  Why didn't we ever give Batherson one in the first place?


 B finds the spot?


 I agree. Don't think G will score enough goals to warrant a square.

How about B bangs it home.



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 28185
Date:
Permalink  
 
data_sprite12 wrote:

Honest question: do we think Giroux will score enough to retain his square?  Why didn't we ever give Batherson one in the first place?


 B finds the spot?



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 2669
Date:
Permalink  
 

Honest question: do we think Giroux will score enough to retain his square?  Why didn't we ever give Batherson one in the first place?



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 28185
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:

That was a MUCH better use of 30 minutes since Jim blew me off, AGAIN.

 

 

Twss 



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 28185
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:

And his suggestions for new squares...

Now that I've got the register — the card runs on recognition, not description. Half these squares are a noise the thread makes.

"Oh, we're doing this again" — the specific failure mode you've watched forty times. Failed breakout, back-door tap-in, whatever your board's particular wound is. Marks itself.

"Hockey happened" — the goal nobody can explain. Puck off three shins and a stanchion. Distinct from AYKM, which is skill; this is entropy.

"He's fine" — player takes a puck somewhere unfortunate, stays down, gets up, keeps playing. The thread says it in unison every time.

"Zamboni-adjacent" — anything that stops play for a reason that isn't hockey. Ice repair, broken glass, a hat that came out late, debris. Good square because it's genuinely unpredictable but unmistakable when it happens.


 the back-door tap-in is......rather sentient for this forum. 



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 28185
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:

Screenshot 2026-08-17 at 4.44.28 PM.png


 



Stupid Canadian Wolf Bird
Status: Offline
Posts: 19798
Date:
Permalink  
 

That was a MUCH better use of 30 minutes since Jim blew me off, AGAIN.

 

I like the equipment malfunction idea, happens just often enough to be effective I think. And, after conversations with multiple LLMs, it looks like we have most everything else covered anyway. lol



Stupid Canadian Wolf Bird
Status: Offline
Posts: 19798
Date:
Permalink  
 

And his suggestions for new squares...

Now that I've got the register — the card runs on recognition, not description. Half these squares are a noise the thread makes.

"Oh, we're doing this again" — the specific failure mode you've watched forty times. Failed breakout, back-door tap-in, whatever your board's particular wound is. Marks itself.

"Hockey happened" — the goal nobody can explain. Puck off three shins and a stanchion. Distinct from AYKM, which is skill; this is entropy.

"He's fine" — player takes a puck somewhere unfortunate, stays down, gets up, keeps playing. The thread says it in unison every time.

"Zamboni-adjacent" — anything that stops play for a reason that isn't hockey. Ice repair, broken glass, a hat that came out late, debris. Good square because it's genuinely unpredictable but unmistakable when it happens.



Stupid Canadian Wolf Bird
Status: Offline
Posts: 19798
Date:
Permalink  
 

Screenshot 2026-08-17 at 4.44.28 PM.png



Attachments
Stupid Canadian Wolf Bird
Status: Offline
Posts: 19798
Date:
Permalink  
 

After explaining London Bobby as "London Bobby is when the refs emphatically, or repeatedly,  blow their whistles."

 

Ah — the traffic-cop whistle. Makes the sequel square obvious too: it's the encore performance, same as your second-post square.

Which leaves LUBE! and Oops, my bad as my only remaining guesses. If LUBE isn't Ullmark, I've got nothing.



 
1 2  >  Last»  | Page of 2  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.